Case Study · April 2026 · IoT Radio Matching

Broadband Antenna Matching for a Multi-Band RF Transceiver

Four ISM-band matching networks for a TI CC1101-based transceiver — designed, iterated, and verified in-case with display. All bands passed the −10 dB return-loss specification.

Sub-GHz · 315 – 928 MHz Matching Networks ISM Bands Client: KickR Design
The assembled INTERRUPT handheld with display installed, rubber-banded together, USB charging cable attached, and two RF coax cables connected on the right side for in-case |S11| measurement. The red CC1101 system board is visible through the keypad cutouts on the front.
Production hardware on the bench. The display is installed, the case is closed, and the two chip antennas are connected via coax to the VNA — the only condition under which a production match means anything.
4 / 4
Bands in spec
All passed −10 dB return-loss threshold
315– 928
MHz coverage
315 · 433 · 868 · 915 MHz ISM
≤ −10 dB
Return loss
All bands, in-case with display installed
≈ 6 per band
Solder iterations
2× reduction vs. full SOL calibration
§1 · Overview

Four ISM bands, two antennas, one transceiver.

KickR Design asked MRS to deliver production-ready matching networks for a sub-GHz multi-band RF transceiver built around the TI CC1101RGPR. The board supports four ISM bands routed through an SP4T switch to two chip antennas: a narrowband Yageo ANT1204F002R0315A for 315 MHz, and a multi-band Abracon ACR1504I3 for 433, 868, and 915 MHz.

Each band needed a matching network such that |S₁₁| ≤ −10 dB across the required operational range, measured in-case with the display installed — the closest metallic object to the antennas and, therefore, the largest source of detuning. Deliverables were the four matching designs with component values keyed to the production schematic.

"Measured in-case with display." Anything else is a tuned bench, not a production radio. The display moves the antennas; the matching network must move with it.
§2 · Architecture

The signal chain — and why the antennas couple.

The handheld opened along its hinge: the red CC1101 system board lies flat on the bench, the back of the LCD display sits in the lifted case half, and two thin coax probes are taped down to the board near the matching-network region for VNA measurement. The chip antennas are visible in the upper corner of the red PCB, adjacent to the back of the display — the source of the antenna detuning the matching networks have to correct.

The CC1101's differential RF port is driven through an Anaren B0310J50100AHF balun into a SKY13414-485LF SP4T switch, which selects one of four per-band matching networks. Only one band is active at a time; the switch common port references 50 Ω post-balun. The photo shows the board in its production case with the display lifted on its hinge and two coax probes taped to the matching-network test points.

Both antennas sit in the same corner of the PCB, directly adjacent to the back of the display — which measurably couples them and detunes them: tuning one band shifts the response of another, and any match measured with the display removed is a lie. That coupling drove the retune order described in the next section.

§3 · Approach

Three calibration strategies. The third one worked.

Three approaches were attempted before the efficient one took hold:

  1. Analytic PCB model. A simple delay + attenuation model of the trace from the balun to the matching network. Fast, but could not converge without capturing the balun and switch — the first-pass match for RF4 was the only one it produced cleanly.
  2. Full Short / Open / Load calibration. Characterizing the PCB at both sides of each matching network. Highly accurate, but each band required six calibration solderings and three more components per tweak — sustainable for one band, not four, with the board's wear budget.
  3. Three-measurement calibration (adopted). A variation of the first approach: measure the antenna alone, then in series with a known inductor, then with an additional shunt capacitor. Those three measurements extract delay and attenuation for the simple model, after which 2–3 component iterations center each band. Total: about six solderings per band, a 2× reduction over the full SOL approach.

The retune order was driven by coupling: RF3 (315 MHz) was tuned first because shifts there propagated to the other three bands through the shared antenna geometry. RF4, RF2, and RF1 were then remeasured, tweaked, and finalized in sequence.

§4 · Validation

Final results — all four bands.

Measurements taken in-case with the display installed. Each chart references the chip's target differential impedance (not 50 Ω), so the −10 dB threshold corresponds to the conjugate match CC1101 datasheets specify.

RF3

315 MHz Band

314–316 MHz · FCC Part 15 ✓ Pass
|S11| versus frequency for the 315 MHz band. The curve dips below −14 dB inside the gold band indicating the required 314–316 MHz range.
Final |S₁₁| measurement — gold band indicates the required frequency range.
Antenna
Yageo ANT1204F002R0315A
Required BW
2 MHz
Target impedance
122 + j31 Ω
Matching topology
51 nH series · 7 pF shunt
Board refdes
X1 = 51 nH, X4 = 7 pF
Result (in-band)
−14 to −15 dB

Note. Band was retuned first because 315 MHz affects the others through antenna coupling. In-case, in-spec.

RF4

433 MHz Band

432–434 MHz · Region 1 ISM ✓ Pass
|S11| versus frequency for the 433 MHz band, showing a minimum of −13.3 dB across the required range.
Final |S₁₁| measurement — gold band indicates the required frequency range.
Antenna
Abracon ACR1504I3
Required BW
1.74 MHz
Target impedance
116 + j41 Ω
Matching topology
20 nH series · 0.5 pF shunt
Board refdes
X19 = 20 nH, X23 = 0.5 pF
Result (in-band)
−13.3 dB (min)

Note. Relative to 866 MHz (≈2×), the same topology scales cleanly. No final tweak required after the 315 MHz retune.

RF2

868 MHz Band

863–870 MHz · ETSI EN 300 220 ✓ Pass
|S11| versus frequency for the 868 MHz band, showing −15 dB or better across the required range.
Final |S₁₁| measurement — gold band indicates the required frequency range.
Antenna
Abracon ACR1504I3
Required BW
7 MHz
Target impedance
86 + j43 Ω
Matching topology
4 pF shunt · 15 nH series · 1.0 pF shunt
Board refdes
X10 = 4 pF, X7 = 15 nH, X11 = 1.0 pF
Result (in-band)
−15 dB or better

Note. Hardest match of the four. L-section wasn't enough; added a shunt cap to move the resonance into band.

RF1

915 MHz Band

900–928 MHz · FCC Part 15.247 ✓ Pass
|S11| versus frequency for the 915 MHz band, showing −17 dB at 911 MHz across the 26 MHz required range.
Final |S₁₁| measurement — gold band indicates the required frequency range.
Antenna
Abracon ACR1504I3
Required BW
26 MHz
Target impedance
86 + j43 Ω
Matching topology
2 pF shunt · 15 nH series · 0.2 pF shunt
Board refdes
X16 = 2 pF, X13 = 15 nH, X17 = 0.2 pF
Result (in-band)
−17 dB at 911 MHz

Note. Widest fractional bandwidth. Centered the resonance on the band after adjusting the input shunt down to 2 pF.

§5 · Production

Recommendations for production.

Important notes & disclaimers

  • Results apply to the as-measured PCB with the display installed. Changes to enclosure material, nearby metal, or antenna placement may require retuning.
  • Published with KickR Design's written permission. Schematic reference designators (X16, X13, etc.) match the board revision current at the time of work.
  • Outcome is specific to this engagement; past results do not guarantee identical outcomes on other designs.
Have a similar problem?

Bring us your spec — we'll tell you what's possible.

30-minute scoping call, no charge. Bring a band plan, schematic, or a screenshot of whatever's not matching. We'll tell you whether a similar engagement is the right fit and what it would cost.

Book a Scoping Call →

Last updated: May 2026